16 July 2024
The Geneva Human Rights Platform (GHRP) is pleased to announce the release of the final report of its Treaty Body Follow-Up Review Pilot Series. This initiative, implemented in collaboration with the Commonwealth Secretariat and the Pacific Community, significantly contributed to the broader goals of the treaty body strengthening process, including pilot follow-up reviews conducted in Sierra Leone (2021), Grenada (2022), and the Pacific Region (2023).
In 2022, the Chairs of the Treaty Bodies (TBs) agreed on an eight-year cycle for full reviews with mid-term follow-up reviews. This approach aims to reduce the review burden on States, ensure equal treatment, and maintain system cost-effectiveness. The follow-up reviews, focusing on up to four priority issues, provide timely attention to critical matters while balancing cost and resource demands. The OHCHR, when developing an action plan to implement these conclusions, proposed three follow-up review options: direct correspondence, hybrid/online dialogue, and in-situ visits. The consultations did not result in a consensus among states, and preferences varied. However, several stakeholders, including a coalition of prominent international CSOs, emphasized the need for a 'meaningful mid-term exercise', and highlighted the importance of an interactive dialogue between the Committee and the state delegation, as well as the engagement of all relevant stakeholders.
Domenico Zipoli, Project Coordinator of the Geneva Human Rights Platform, explained, 'In response to the move towards a predictable review calendar and regular mid-term follow-up reviews, the GHRP considered it crucial to explore how follow-up reviews could be undertaken at the national and regional levels, thereby making the UN TB system more relevant, responsive and closer to rights holders and duty-bearers.'
The Treaty Body Follow-Up Review Pilot Series was designed to assess the effectiveness of holding follow-up review sessions at both national and regional levels. The primary objectives were to:
Geneva Academy
Geneva Academy
Geneva Academy
The initiative tested two distinct of models: national-level and regional-level follow-up reviews:
The final report of the pilot series was launched at two key events in New York and Geneva. The first launch, a side-event to the 36th Annual Meeting of Treaty Body Chairpersons, took place in New York on 28th June 2024. The second launch, a side-event to the 56th Human Rights Council session, was held in Geneva on 9th July 2024. The recording of the second event can be accessed here.
Discussions at both events stressed the need to develop a meaningful and context-sensitive follow-up review procedure, enhancing the overall efficiency and impact of the UN human rights treaty bodies.
'A national or regional level follow-up review not only brings visibility to the UN treaty body system but also provides an opportunity for states, particularly small states, and their civil society counterpart to effectively engage. It enables a larger number of ministries as part of the delegation to participate, which might otherwise be difficult during Geneva reviews due to cost implications. As observed during these follow-up reviews, it also allows UN treaty body members to see firsthand the implementation of treaty provisions, and make practical recommendations' underlined Steve Onwuasoanya, Head (ag), Human Rights Unit, Commonwealth Secretariat.
The final report of the Treaty Body Follow-Up Review Pilot Series underscores the potential of both national and regional follow-up reviews in fostering the practical implementation of human rights obligations. Recommendations include adopting a regional model for follow-up reviews, including “roving delegations” where members from multiple TBs conduct follow-up review sessions at regional UN offices according to a predictable schedule. This method enhances state participation, fosters collaboration, and reduces financial burdens. Other recommendations include targeted regional follow-up review sessions for LDCs and SIDS and – as a minimum - employing online or hybrid dialogues as follow-up reviews to ensure inclusive and comprehensive engagement.
'These recommendations, particularly the adoption of a regional follow-up review model, could significantly improve state reporting and implementation, as well as provide critical guidance for the upcoming General Assembly resolution on the human rights treaty body system in December 2024. The Geneva Human Rights Platform remains committed to supporting the continuous improvement and strengthening of UN human rights treaty bodies through innovative initiatives and collaborative efforts.', explained Felix Kirchmeier, Executive Director of the Geneva Human Rights Platform.
The final report is available for download here.
For further details on the initiative, visit our dedicated portal.
Geneva Academy
Our recent Academy Briefing, 'The Human Rights Data Revolution', has garnered significant international recognition in recent months with presentations in Indonesia, Paraguay and at the United Nations in New York.
The Indigenous Navigator
Via its DHRTTDs Directory, the Geneva Human Rights Platform provides a comprehensive list and description of such key tools and databases. But how to navigate them? Which tool should be used for what, and by whom? This interview helps us understand better the specificities of the current highlight of the directory: The Indigenous Navigator
UN Photo / Jean-Marc Ferré
This training course will explore the origin and evolution of the Universal Periodic Review (UPR) and its functioning in Geneva and will focus on the nature of implementation of the UPR recommendations at the national level.
The Geneva Human Rights Platform contributes to this review process by providing expert input via different avenues, by facilitating dialogue on the review among various stakeholders, as well as by accompanying the development of a follow-up resolution to 68/268 in New York and in Geneva.
Adobe
To unpack the challenges raised by artificial intelligence, this project will target two emerging and under-researched areas: digital military technologies and neurotechnology.
Geneva Academy