8 March 2024, 13:15-14:45
Register start 12 February 2024
Register end 8 March 2024
Event
Adobe
Over the last two decades, a growing number of states have adopted new laws and mechanisms to address a longstanding gap in national criminal laws: the absence of meaningful procedures to raise post-conviction claims of factual innocence, including based on newly discovered evidence in death penalty cases. These legal and policy reforms respond to a surge of exonerations worldwide, facilitated by the growth of national innocence movements that are increasingly collaborating across national boundaries.
It is striking that these developments have occurred with little direct help from international law. Although the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR) and regional human rights treaties recognize extensive fair trial and appeal rights, no international human rights instrument – in its text, interpretation, or implementation – explicitly and fully recognizes the right to assert a claim of factual innocence. This omission has been described as international law’s ‘innocence gap’. An increasing number of scholars, innocence organizations, and civil society groups argue that international law should play a bigger role in pushing states to ensure meaningful opportunities for wrongfully convicted people to review their cases.
The speakers on this panel – co-organized by our Geneva Human Rights Platform with the European Innocence Network, University of Cincinnati College of Law, Ohio Innocence Project, Projet Innocence Suisse, Duke Law Center for International and Comparative Law and the Duke Law Wilson Center – will analyze the innocence gap in international law and discuss different strategies for achieving greater recognition of an international right to assert claims of factual innocence. The panel will draw upon the insights from efforts to promote other ‘new’ human rights and the experiences of beneficiaries of and participants in domestic advocacy on behalf of individuals who have been wrongfully convicted. In addition, two Europeans who served significant time in prison for crimes they did not commit will share their stories.
Disclaimer
This event may be filmed, recorded and/or photographed on behalf of the Geneva Academy. The Geneva Academy may use these recordings and photographs for internal and external communications for information, teaching and research purposes, and/or promotion and illustration through its various media channels (website, social media, newsletters, annual report, etc.).
By participating in this event, you are agreeing to the possibility of appearing in the aforementioned films, recordings and photographs, and their subsequent use by the Geneva Academy.
Adobe
Our research brief, Neurotechnology and Human Rights: An Audit of Risks, Regulatory Challenges, and Opportunities, examines the human rights implications of neurotechnology in both therapeutic and commercial applications.
Adobe
Our recent research brief series explores how the United Nations' human rights system can enhance its role in early warning and conflict prevention.
This training course will delve into the means and mechanisms through which national actors can best coordinate their human rights monitoring and implementation efforts, enabling them to strategically navigate the UN human rights system and use the various mechanisms available in their day-to-day work.
UN Photo / Jean-Marc Ferré
UNAMID
This project will develop guidance to inform security, human rights and environmental debates on the linkages between environmental rights and conflict, and how their better management can serve as a tool in conflict prevention, resilience and early warning.
Geneva Academy
Geneva Academy